Daniel Webster’s bio on his congressional website states that his academic and work background is in engineering. Unfortunately, he seems to abandon his technical knowledge by declaring that he’ll help fight FEMA’s updated flood zone maps for the county.

FEMA’s flood hazard mapping (which involves computer modeling) follows a rigorous set of guidelines, standards and technical references. It uses updated data on, for example, surface water; groundwater; tidal elevations; soils; wetlands; past storm events; land development; and the types, elevation and locations of structures (drainage, roads, houses, businesses, other buildings).

The maps cannot be appealed just because someone doesn’t like what they show. According to FEMA’s appeal regulations (44 CFR Part 67) and guidance, appellants must provide “alternative analyses” that incorporate the “methodologies, assumptions or data” to make their case. They should be “prepared to perform coastal, hydrologic and hydraulic analyses, to plot new and/or revised Flood Profiles, and to delineate revised (floodway) boundaries as necessary.” All of this technical information, required to be certified by registered professional engineers or licensed land surveyors, only succeeds if the draft maps are shown to be “scientifically or technically incorrect.”

Given the cost and breadth of technical research and verification needed to successfully refute a draft FEMA flood hazard map, can anyone take seriously Webster’s claim that “it’s just a matter of pushing hard” against FEMA?

We, as taxpayers, are paying time and time again to rebuild roads, schools, emergency response offices, public parks and cleanup debris. The federal flood insurance program is not fully supported by premiums. The goal of accurate and updated flood hazard mapping is ultimately “to reduce the potential for loss of life and property.” This worthy goal is jeopardized when homeowners, businesses and community leaders cannot access the most up-to-date maps in order to plan for the future and make wise decisions about how to spend their money without undue risk.

Leslie Barras


Unlimited digital access offer

To continue with unlimited access to Chronicle Online after this limited time trial click the button below. Offer expires September 30, 2019.

(4) comments

Miuke Nelson

I hope you are right. The Trumpian way to deal with inconvenient truths is to discredit the scientists and gut the agency.

CitrusCo Citizen

Thank you for this information, Leslie. It is as I expected--no politician who is hoping to gain favor and votes from homeowners, businesses, developers, real estate agents, etc. can promise to have the FEMA flood zone maps changed. If he pretends that he can he is, in my opinion, committing fraud by deceiving those who will be affected by future flooding. I'm concerned that real estate agents and developers will not inform prospective home buyers that their "dream home" is located in a flood zone.


The newest real estate listing to beware, "Waterfront and Back".

CitrusCo Citizen

Ha ha. Here are some more ads that real estate agents on the Gulf Coast can use: "Launch your canoe directly from your garage/boathouse! Never worry about watering your lawn again! Keep your pool filled permanently! Go fishing from your own front porch! This waterfront house will float your boat!"

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.