Brian Coleman, commissioners at meeting

Citrus County Commissioner Brian Coleman, center, chairs his first meeting on Nov. 19. Flanking him, from left, are Commissioners Jimmie T. Smith, Scott Carnahan, Ron Kitchen Jr. and Jeff Kinnard.

For three years, Commissioner Brian Coleman has watched colleagues Scott Carnahan, Ron Kitchen Jr. and Jeff Kinnard take their turns as board chairman.

Now Coleman has the gavel and he isn’t taking the role lightly.

“We don’t have a lot of conflict between commissioners and I want to keep that going,” Coleman said.

Coleman is ending his first and only term. After defeating incumbent Scott Adams in 2016, Coleman announced this year that he would not be seeking re-election.

That puts Coleman in the unusual position of being chairman during an election year when his name won’t be on the ballot.

He has some ideas, both in terms of how meetings are conducted and what he would like to see the board accomplish in 2020. They include:

• As a retired sheriff’s deputy, code compliance has been one of Coleman’s top goals since he took office. While he said the issue has gotten better, with the county now taking a harder stand against property owners with junkyard conditions, Coleman said the county can do better.

The biggest public concern, he said, is the only way to start a code investigation is through a citizen complaint.

The problem is twofold: Residents often do not want to give their names, and the process keeps code officers from issuing citations when they see violations on their own.

Coleman said the county should consider dropping the complaint-driven system and hire an additional code compliance officer to handle the uptick in cases.

“To me, it’s a manpower issue,” he said.

• As for running board meetings, Coleman said he doesn’t agree with the practice of not allowing any back-and-forth between commissioners or staffers and the public when residents have questions during the board’s open to the public comment section of the agenda.

He said residents often have simple questions that could be answered on the spot. Instead, the protocol has been to discourage interaction during public comment so as to avoid prolonged debate between residents and commissioners or staff.

“People get there and they get pretty nervous about stuff,” Coleman said. “It’s a little unfair to the public when we can’t answer a simple question. I might get some push back from commissioners, but that’s my prerogative as chairman.”

Coleman said he doesn’t think it’ll get out of hand.

“That’s up to the chairman to keep control over that,” he said.

• Coleman said he encourages spirited debate from commissioners, but would like to see it stick to the issue being discussed.

“Some of our discussions have become too personal,” he said. “I don’t make decisions based on personal reasons. I don’t want personal bias getting in the way. I like deciding what’s best for the community in general.”

• Coleman plans to keep time-certain issues on the agenda, running as close to schedule as possible.

“I don’t want people coming to the meeting,” he said, “and feel like they need to sit there all day.”

Contact Chronicle reporter Mike Wright at 352-563-3228 or

(4) comments


Maybe Coleman can address the contract with Lifestreams. He voted for the change in state providers, however they have not complied with the contract. Mental Health and addictions services have been atrocious in Citrus County. Where is Gene Mcgee now? The Centers brought the idea of an assessment center to the board and there was no public forum allowed. Well, you get what you pay for BOCC. There is no investment in Citrus Couny for services. How many entities have to complain before the Board sees they made a mistake by changing providers? Mr. Coleman, to say there are no person interests involved in your decisions is not true, especially in the Behavior Health care in Citrus County.


Commissioner Coleman is my district commissioner and I appreciate the way he has handled things on the board. He will make a fine chairman. It's a shame that he is not going to stay but I definitely understand the reason why. I like the idea of an additional code-compliance officer and not revealing who made the complaint. Also, code-compliance needs to get out of their office and roam around the county to see some of the terrible conditions of property. They should be able to issue a violation on the spot without the help of a neighbor. I also agree that personal opinions should not be a part of the BOCC interactions and let the people answers to their questions even if it takes a small discussion.

CitrusCo Citizen

A code-compliance officer is a good idea to protect the identity and safety of those who complain about junkyard properties. Complaining about the junk in a nasty neighbor's yard could become dangerous if that neighbor also has "personal problems" and wants to take it out on anyone who files a complaint. Also, I Iike his decision to prohibit the commissioners from injecting their personal biases (e.g. politics and/or religion) into discussions or debates as they decide on policies that affect everyone in the County.


I agree with your statements. I would like to add, mr Coleman can you do something with the old crystal springs strip mall and the old restaurant a eye sore on us 19 . There are several old buildings and a sonic restaurant that needs torn down.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.