.....Advertisement.....
.....Advertisement.....

Public learns about port

-A A +A
By Mike Wright

CRYSTAL RIVER — Citrus County officials brought a message Tuesday night to about 80 people at the Plantation Inn: Port Citrus is not the “silver bullet” answer to the county’s struggling economy.

But it sure could come close.

County Administrator Brad Thorpe and Commissioner Joe Meek provided the county’s first wide-ranging public explanation of the Port Citrus project to area business leaders and residents.

They attended at the invitation of the Crystal River council of the Citrus County Chamber of Commerce, which wanted county officials to explain the potential economic effect the port could have on Crystal River.

While Thorpe and Meek didn’t address that issue specifically, they provided a PowerPoint presentation that showed the history of the project and its potential future.

And Thorpe offered to take the same presentation to any community group that wants to see it.

The county commission, sitting as the Citrus County Port Authority, meets at 9 a.m. Tuesday and is expected to approve sending out requests for qualifications from consultants to conduct a feasibility study. Thorpe said by the end of 2012, the county commission should be in position to decide whether to move forward with the port project.

He said the taxpayers’ risk is minimal. The port would be built along the Cross Florida Barge Canal on private property by a private developer, with some funding possible from the state ports council.

Meek, who is up for re-election next year, said the political risk is worth the effort. Both Meek and Thorpe said the county commission is doing what it can to bring jobs to the county.

“If you’re not here to do what’s best for the county, get out of the way,” Meek said.

The barge canal — 6.5 miles long, 14 feet deep and 250 feet wide — was originally planned to slice across the state to the St. Johns River, creating a shipping channel between the Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic Ocean.

President Richard Nixon stopped the $74 million project in 1971 for environmental reasons.

What’s left is an asset the county should not ignore, Meek said.

“From a purely geographic standpoint, we have something not many places have,” he said. “Two words that describe this port: opportunity and possibility.”

Thorpe and Meek answered several questions from the audience, including:

Q: Who pays for the construction?

A: The port developer. It would not be up to county taxpayers to pay for any construction of the port.

Q: What will the feasibility study cover? What if the study says this isn’t a good idea?

A: The study will determine what works best along the barge canal as it sits today. It will include an economic and market analysis.

“We fully expect the feasibility study to come back with the facts,” Meek said. “We’re not going to push something that’s not there.”

Q: How safe will it be for canoeists and kayaks on the barge canal when barges are heading in and out?

A: The canal is wide enough. “A fairly good boater can figure out a way to get past that barge,” Thorpe said.

Q: What’s the realistic trickle down economic benefit to Crystal River and the county?

A: Unknown. The feasibility study will determine that.

Q: Will the barge canal be dredged for this project?

A: No.

Q: Who stands to lose the most if Port Citrus fails?

A: Everyone. “If there’s a better idea out there to diversify our economy, I’d like to hear it,” Thorpe said.

Q: A 1985 port study showed four possible uses for the barge canal. A marina was first and barge port fourth. Are county officials taking that study into account?

A: Yes, but the study was done on behalf of a marina project and it’s also 26 years old.

Q: Has the county considered long-term impacts on county infrastructure, such as roads and law enforcement, if the port is built?

A: The port will be self-supporting. Thorpe said the county has similar programs now at the county landfill and its utilities, which are funded by fees and not taxpayers.

Q: What are potential consequences to manatees?

A: Unknown, but that will be addressed in the permitting process.

Chronicle reporter Mike Wright can be reached at (352) 563-3228 or mwright@chronicleonline.com.

get busy

Here's an idea for your MR. Thorpe, Sir. Walk into CMH or just about any medical facilitly in this county and what do you see? Stryker hospital beds and equipment manufactured in Kalamazoo, MI. Three of the Stryker family are on Forbes 400 of richest Americans. We don't need their medical equipment if we make it right here in Citrus County so take advantage of the proximity to UF and CFCC and even the tech school for talent. Heck, even some of our food products in our public schools are manufactured in the rust belt. A special task force to identify where our money is going and how we can translate that into jobs for Citrus residents is what's needed.

There are qualified consultants in Citrus County

The land owners along the canal are the big issue at hand. I am sure close ties are somewhere with a bigger agenda.Lets do a study on that..

Port of Gold?

If this pig in a polk is being built with private contractor money, than why is 50K of TAXPAYER money being used in the feasibility studies. Seems to us there are far too many "unknows" in this to be feasible.....

Check out the Mining Interests

This is the "Pig in a Polk" that is being hidden from the public discussions.

The only benefit is going to be to the mining interests who have not yet obtained permission to destroy the land with their bulldozers and strip mining equipment.

One of the tenets of identifying the greed is, "Follow the money trail!" Who is getting donations to their political coffers? Who is never mentioned as the biggest beneficiary of a "Port?" Who owns the mining claims near and adjacent to the "Port?" Is the land adjacent to the "Port" planned for multi-use or for mining? The answers will amaze all of us.

Perhaps the Citrus County Commissioners should use their influence to affect a land use change of the land from "Agricultural Use" to "Multi-Use Business" (excluding MINING operations.

"Follow the money trail!"

Send me a check

I can cut the cost of the feasibility study. Here's a better idea - build a marina and recreation area. Make a section available for off road use. Notice how many motorcycle and off-road vehicles are sold and ridden in the county? Talk about opportunity. One annual off-road rally would attract way more revenue than a shallow water port. Another area could be an campground. The dike on the north side of the canal between the upper and lower Withlacoochee makes a great overnight spot for kayakers and canoeists. I find it hard to believe that anyone living in Citrus County even has to ask about potential consequences to the manatee... but for Mr. Thorp and Mr. Meeks the answer is yes there are consequences for the manatee. I will defer explanation of said consequences to Helen Spivey. Give her a call and see what she thinks. I think Mr. Meeks is talking out both sides of his mouth when he says “We’re not going to push something that’s not there.” Seems to me he already is doing just that. The real question is who stands to gain from this boondoggle, the residents and businesses of the county or a chosen few who have a higher stake. So I answered three of the questions without even trying. I'll save everyone some money. For $1000 I do a powerpoint/feasability study.