.....Advertisement.....
.....Advertisement.....

'Last Man Standing' ends in four-way tie

-A A +A

Health of contestants was an issue

By Pat Faherty

CRYSTAL RIVER — The black circles ringing her eyes hardly hid her anger.


And even standing motionless, shoeless and on the edge of a parking lot puddle in torn jeans, dirty wet socks and a damp hoodie, it was obvious to everyone, Rachael Powalish was upset.
 

The Crystal River nail technician was the last woman standing in the “Last Man Standing” competition and one of the final four.
 

The 38-year-old single mother of two had trooped along for more than 75 hours and watched 43 others, including 13 women, drop out. She had stood night and day through sun and rain, hardly moving, eating and drinking little.
 

Contestants got a five-minute bathroom break every eight hours and were restricted to a confined area in the rear parking lot of the Crystal River Mall.
 

Supporters could pass them select food and recharge cell phones; the event supplied beverages.


The remaining standers competing against her for the winner-take-all $5,000 purse were father and son Eddie and Ed Hendrickson of Homosassa and Steven Goforth of Crystal River.


There were various rules, but “Last Man Standing” is not a precision sport and final word on any issue fell to James Dykes, head judge and organizer.


Early Tuesday afternoon, the event had hit a stalemate. All four looked worn, frazzled and foggy. The Hendricksons joked about their hallucinations and Goforth wondered if he would be able to drive home. Powalish just stood and stared, a UM (University of Miami) cap holding back her dirty blond hair.
 

But some of the supporters, mostly family members and friends, were getting concerned about the length of the event. And Dykes, who thought it should have ended by noon, was worried about their health.


He talked with each of them trying to broker a split. But they would not have it, each vowing to hang on.


He tried it again later without luck, but knew something had to be done. He offered to reset the rules, they could take a break, eat and drink whatever they needed and he would restart the clock.


It seemed fair to the three guys, but Powalish wasn’t buying it. “I’m not hungry, I’m just sleepy,” she said. “I feel confident, I feel good. If I eat and drink now, I’ll be here for another three days and I don’t have time.”


Then things started breaking down. The others accepted resetting the rules, but she raged against the change or compromising in any way. There were heated words between her, Eddie Hendrickson and Dykes.
 

They were now pushing 78 hours. “It’s not worth our health for five grand,” Hendrickson said, referring to the $5,000 prize planned for a sole winner. But she would not budge.


Finally Dykes announced it was over, there would be four winners instead of one and they would split the prize.


It took a few seconds for her to absorb the decision. “I could have won,” she said. “I could have won.”


Contact Chronicle reporter Pat Faherty at 352-564-2924 or pfaherty@chronicleonline.com.

Last WOMAN standing

What a crock!

I lasted 40 hours and 45 minutes before my feet gave out and I have huge respect for Rachael and the others who outlasted me fair and square. I hesitate to continue writing for fear of being called a sore loser, but I will take that risk.

This event was the most unprofessional, poorly organized, shenanigans filled contest I've ever seen or participated in. Many of us contestants didn't know it was going to be outside the mall, not inside, until we showed up Saturday morning. I had been told to be there by 8:30, others had been told 8am or 7:30, but it didn't actually start until 10am. Next surprise was no written rules, in fact, it seemed as though James was making them up as we went along, he was certainly changing them at whim and making exceptions for certain favored contestants.

For example: 1) The "rule" that no clothing could be brought in for us once it started, yet one contestant was allowed to have her sister bring her a pair of sneakers. 2) At first we were told the "rule" that all food brought to us HAD to come from the "food court or Nathan's (inside KMart)" and NO drinks could be brought to us, yet I saw one contestant drinking a bottle of Mountain Dew (which certainly did not come from James' coolers), I saw a contestant be allowed to have an orange juice brought in to him, and later on the "rule" was changed to allow any food from the grocery section of KMart, but was never announced until we started questioning why some people were eating cans of tuna and fruit. Some contestants were eating bananas but one contestant was not allowed an orange. 3) The "rule" that contestants were not allowed to touch anyone outside the tapes, that was changed at some point and contestants were allowed to hug and kiss family members on their breaks (which could provide opportunity to pass stimulants to them). I could go on, but I think you can get the gist of what I'm saying.

I just hope that the winners actually do receive their money. By the way, I will not hide behind the anonymity of the internet. My name is Charann Schwartz, you can find me on Facebook if you wish.

Sore loser is an under

Sore loser is an under statement in this case. The rules did change as this event progressed. I had no choice to change them because the contestants constantly sought ways to push the limits. The concept was simple..stand longer than anyone else..But the petty attempts of each competitor to get rid of each other became a burden within itself. It doesnt matter if someone had a mountain dew or ate an orange..The outcome would have been the same. I tried to be fair and create an environment that would allow everyone to enjoy themselves and have fun. Your petty accusations only reflect your inability to compete on the same level as the winners. They did beat you fair and square and only remained because they did what was asked of them. Noone that was in the top ten has had a single complaint about the event or the manner in which it was conducted. If everything you complained about was handled any differently then what would be different in the outcome. You were done at 40 hours..the winners stood for almost 78...the bottom line is they had the desire and overcame..and you did not. Not even close. I am sorry you did not perform well and you were not prepared for the intensity it required. You did not have to compete at all. Once you arrived and did not find the situation suitable you could have taken your money back and went home. You chose to compete and chose to stand. You failed. Get over it and feel free to try again in Ocala. Noone ever won anything by whining.

I agree Char

when I read this article, of course I immediately thought of you. I had no idea it was outside either until I read another article about this. How stupid. It sounds very poorly planned. A great idea to attract publicity for Kia(?) but someone didn't think things through very well.

Last WOMAN standing

Citrus Kia didn't seem very well organized as the primary sponsor, either. They had 2 people with one car manning their tent for about 4 hrs on Saturday and that was it. They came back on Sunday to pack up their tent. Circus county at it's finest.