A.B. Sidibe
Lou Elliott Jones
Staff report
INGLIS — Citizens in this southern Levy County town voted Tuesday to scrap their police and fire services and hand the work to the county sheriff’s office.
Voters also gave the nod to many of the dissident candidates who have championed doing away with the police force for several years. All charter amendment measures on the ballot also passed.
Last year, a similar election to disband the five-person police force was unsuccessful.
However, this year, not only did the amendment to dissolve the police department succeed, some of the people previously involved in the movement to dissolve it also won town commission seats. Their issues last year with the police department stemmed from what they called aggressive police tactics, especially when it came to traffic enforcement and tracking people as they exit local bars.
Incumbent Mayor James Williams was defeated by Glenda Kirkland 60 percent to 40 percent.
For the two two-year commission seats, Sally Price and Ann Morin got 34 and 26 percent of the vote ,respectively, out of a field of five candidates, making them the winners to fill those seats. Incumbents Tom Brennan and Robert Webb got 18 and 17 percent of the vote, while Stephen Smalldridge finished with 5 percent.
“I think I speak for all the officers here, we feel let down,” Officer John Dowd of the Inglis Police Department said.
Dowd said as it stands, it appears all of them will be without work come October.
“I really think the wording of the amendment misled a lot of people because they thought we were just going to be absorbed by the sheriff’s office,” Dowd said.
Dowd, who doubles as spokesman for the department, said he wanted to reassure town residents his agency will continue to perform duties in a professional and dedicated manner until the town terminates their employment.
Besides voting for the amendment to hand police and fire operations to the county, voters passed the following amendments:
* Requiring deletion of the town’s mandatory garbage collection ordinance and removing the mandatory water ordinance.
* Forbidding the commission to remove or modify existing elected terms of office.
* Requiring a vacancy on the commission be filled by the second highest vote-getter in the previous election instead of the current system where vacancies are filled by a vote of the commission.
* Requiring a five-day work week for all municipal offices.
* Removal of existing assessments and voter approval of future assessments.
Levy County officials are taking a wait-and-see attitude about developments.
Levy County Sheriff Bobby McCallum said if the disbanding comes to fruition, a lot of work would have to go into his office taking over. On Feb. 12, McCallum responded to a request by Inglis town leaders to provide a proposed contract
and costs for protection.
“I told them it depends on what they want,” McCallum said. “If they want services that we provide they would be part of a zone which they are now.
“If they want the same type of services — around-the-clock services — that would require a contract,” McCallum said. “They would have to fund those services ….”
McCallum said the cost for 24-hour, seven-day-a-week coverage would require five full-time deputy positions be added to his office.
“The first year would be $396,420.50. That’s because there would be some startup costs,” he said.
“The second would go down some to $349,387, and the third would be $361,511. “What this does not include is staffing the office in Inglis,” McCallum said. “For that you would be adding about $43,000 to each of those years’ figures. That would cover staffing their building and paying the utilities and those sorts of things”
McCallum said he would not agree to anything less than a three-year contract.
He said the city’s police officers are not granted carte blanche employment with the county. They would have to apply and go through the hiring process as do others seeking to become county deputies. That would include an extensive criminal background check and drug testing.
“That’s because these would be additional, new positions because I take on all the liability as sheriff,” McCallum said. “There’s no guarantee I’d hire the current personnel. I have nothing against them at all. But we do background and see what fits best.”
If the department is disbanded without a contract being signed, McCallum said, “We’ll cover and answer calls there. What they don’t get is — they don’t get somebody in those limits around the clock. It will be part of a larger zone — like Bronson is and that has some 300 square miles in it. We’ll take calls and work calls as they come in.”
“They’re a municipality. They have a charter and under their charter they have a responsibility to provide police and fire (service). If they choose not to do that, that is their issue,” McCallum said.
David Knowles, Levy County director of public safety and county fire chief, had little comment on the election results, noting there is a legal challenge to the charter changes that could delay the changes beyond the Sept. 30 deadline. There is an injunction hearing scheduled on the matter March 21.
Knowles, who saw an earlier attempt by the Inglis Fire Department to merge into the county department fail because the county levies an annual $90-per-residence fire assessment in addition to property taxes, said the assessment issue would play into any absorption. The assessment is based on varying costs for square footage according to the property’s use for commercial, industrial, retail and warehouse facilities.
Knowles just completed a similar merger with the Yankeetown Fire Department where the town retains its building and the county manages the fire service and an assessment will be levied starting Oct. 1.
Inglis would have to take similar action, Knowles said. “In order for the county to do it, they would have to participate in the county fire assessment program.”
Contact Chronicle reporter A.B. Sidibe at 352-564-2925 or asidibe@chronicleonline.com.
Add new comment
Read and share your thoughts on this story
Welcome Inglis LEOs
It seems painfully clear there are either: 1) Inglis Police or 2) LEO cheerleaders who will do anything to promote the necessity of their ilk.
One has to ask, if positioning a cruiser on 19 over the bridge to pull people over has real value in a town that shuts down at 7pm on most nights. One blinking redlight and a low population density.
This mindset that we need wall to wall law enforcement is insanity.
Next step, halve the staff of the county sheriff.
Stupidity, Plain old Stupidity!
Inglis might not need a huge police force but, they need a force no matter what. Police presence in the area hasn't slowed the movement of drugs throughout the area but, without a presence of a law enforcement agency in the area it is sure to increase causing an influx of crime and the building of an enclave that will force good residents to flee the area making Inglis a possible ghetto. Contracting with the Sheriff's Department isn't as wonderful as it sounds. The cost is extravagant and the service will be sub-par at best. The way these idiots voted was based on budget and monetary views. The safety of residents will be at stake now and it will still be about money. The budget isn't going to decrease enough to make a difference but, the difference will be felt throughout the community. Within the next 5 years Inglis will be a ghetto, a ghost town of drug addicted residents with criminal intentions. Businesses will soon be leaving the area, therefore, forcing residents to sell homes and move to less drug infested, criminal areas. Did these idiots even consider the social make-up of Inglis? What was the reason behind making this final decision after recent votes against it? Why would a community deny itself the presence of law enforcement even though it is dysfunctional. They could have cleaned house and hired and elected trustworthy officers that would not start their careers in a corrupt organization. However, just to do away with law enforcement presence all together brings about a slew of new problems the city will begin to feel almost immediately. Good luck to those residents hope your decision is going to be just what you wanted! Idiots never have forethought!
Brealistic
KLG, idiots? Really?
Perhaps same folks who came around to logic & historical facts over a 4 year period, formerly voting on this issue 2x, the other way?
WHY? Painfully simple & imperically necessary. We have a Corrupt Chief, who replaced a CORRUPT Chief, who Replaced a CONVICTED Corrupt Chief (stealing & using DRUGS/money From IPD PROPERTY ROOM); underlings have a string of resignations(should have been terminations & revocations of L/E Certs.!) as long as your arm for issues like having sex w/ci's IN that same property room. Inglis has had to settle innumerable LAW SUITS, with a HUGE one pending, all because IPD has an 8% historical Conviction Rate while being more than 40% of town's budget. When YOU get it right 8% of the time; would YOU get FIRED? OUR officers(& FORMER CHIEF'S)have graced pages of papers as far away as SARASOTA regarding CRIMINAL CONDUCT involved in either BEFORE being hired, or worse, AFTERWARD! In a year, Sheriff will likely have a SUBSTATION in INGLIS (just like CCSO in Crystal River, MCSO in Belleview, etc.). IF it's good enough for CR, why not Inglis? Since crime rates DROPPED Dramatically, & Law Suit Liability, & Traffic Harrassment, & COSTS OVERALL, TO CR, why should Inglis Citizens expect any less, from the most competent SHERIFF elected in Levy in 12+ Years? INGLIS USED to be a nice place to visit, DRIVE THROUGH, and live...not so much now, and we only KNOW that whatever comes our way (including no protection at all) would be an incredible improvement vs living under legal tyranny. 8%...just THINK about that before calling ANYONE 'idiot' in the future. We wouldn't presume to tell You what's best for You, in YOUR town. The vote was 232/167; that's called a mandate. Mind Your Business & we'll mind ours.
commenting
I can only comment on the information given in the article. Response time would be the biggest factor in my opinion. Thanks for sharing all of the behind the scenes info that most of us were unaware of. If it is true about the Chief, I do not see how he still has the job. That in itself is insane.
belleview has its own police
belleview has its own police dept.
Idiots!
Why on earth would you disband a police department in a community that desperately needs one? That area has a huge drug problem between meth and pills. Using the Sheriff's department is going to mean when there is a problem and someone calls 911 - it will take forever to get a deputy to respond. Who is going to do the task of busting the bad guys now? Those drug offenders, etc. And on top of all of this - you literally put several good men out of work. Nice job idiots! Did you do it because of money? From what I just read it is going to cost you a ton to have a contract with the Sheriff dept. Now all the bad guys/gals are going to move to Inglis/Yankeetown and do their bad deeds because nobody will be there to arrest them! Oh - and did I say IDIOTS!!!! You people are something else.